Humus - Comments

More pages: 1 ... 11 ... 21 ... 31 ... 41 ... 51 ... 61 ... 71 ... 81 ... 91 ... 101 ... 111 ... 121 ... 131 ... 141 ... 151 ... 161 ... 171 ... 181 ... 191 ... 201 ... 211 ... 221 ... 231 ... 241 ... 251 ... 261 ... 271 ... 281 ... 291 ... 301 ... 311 ... 321 ... 331 ... 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 ... 361 ... 371 ... 381 ... 391 ... 401 ... 411 ... 421 ... 431 ... 438

Query FailedJONGPD
Sunday, July 11, 2004

Thank you kindly.

Humus
Saturday, July 10, 2004

MesserFuerFrauSchmid,
there are never any performance guarantees whatsoever, regardless what you do, so that's not even an argument.

pro,
have you tried with full stencil clear enabled? On nVidia hardware you must use full stencil clear for dynamic branching to be faster.

Alstrong
Saturday, July 10, 2004

Is that it?! Where's the rest of them?

pro
Saturday, July 10, 2004

Yes, I use the latest version of your program, (disabled full stencil clear), DirectX 9.0c and Detonator 61.21. You wrote that there is no performance gain on nVidia hardware when full stencil clear is on. I think you mean it is neither faster nor slower. This is also the case for me (20 fps when dynamic branching is on compared 21 when off). So it should be a lot faster (probably 40+ fps) on those other nVidia cards becaused of the saved shader power.

Getting this to work would be very important for me because I am currently experimenting with a soft shadows algorithm based on your latest SelfShadowBump demo which could get nearly as fast as with vanilla shadow mapping. (now its only half the fps)

Anonymous
Friday, July 9, 2004

=P

Anonymous
Friday, July 9, 2004

:P

Nadja
Friday, July 9, 2004

Do you have to be so cool? :-P

Loed
Friday, July 9, 2004

Nice going Humus


General
	News 3D Pictures Textures Articles Cool stuff
Other
	FAQ About Humus
Other 3D sites
	OpenGL.org GameDev.net Beyond3D Rage3D
Programming info
	OpenGL extension registry NeHe