"One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that, lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C programs."
- Robert Firth
More pages: 1 ... 11 ... 21 ... 31 ... 41 ... 51 ... 61 ... 71 ... 81 ... 91 ... 101 ... 111 ... 121 ... 131 ... 141 ... 151 ... 161 ... 171 ... 181 ... 191 ... 201 ... 211 ... 221 ... 231 ... 241 ... 251 ... 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 ... 271 ... 281 ... 291 ... 301 ... 311 ... 321 ... 331 ... 341 ... 351 ... 361 ... 365
Query FailedUtrion
Friday, August 20, 2004

a really nice upgrade for all of your demos would be a benchmarking utilitycause all of the demos are really good looking and have nice technics
Jecht
Friday, August 20, 2004

This demo works with Cat 4.9b, right?
BetrayerX
Friday, August 20, 2004

Nice work Humus!
For the people posting scores....don't bother. I have a 9700Pro and my numbers beat yours big time (429fps on mode 1 to set an example).... And we all know that the idea of a 9700 beating a 6800 is preposterus.

The numbers fluctuate so much that it is simply not accurate. @Humus...Plz if possible do a bench mode....dunno, camera fixed for 20 seconds in each mode would be nice:

Anyway, I am amazed that some new tricks can be squeezed on this old dog....NICE work HUMUS!
Milkman
Thursday, August 19, 2004

Hey Humus thanks for all your advice and tips anyway today I sent you a email
"Can you help me out" I know you must be extremely busy but can you try to reply to that email it would mean the world to me thanks Humus
Humus
Thursday, August 19, 2004

Remij,
it probably won't make much of a difference. A few percent is probably what you're looking at.

MesserFuerFrauSchmid,
no my opinion hasn't changed. My experience with instancing pretty much verified what I expected. It's hard to find real world situations where it matters all that much, or improves it at all. You tend to end up being limited by so many other factors instead.
Cat
Thursday, August 19, 2004

6800GT (default clocks)
P4 3.0C

1. 319 Instancing
2. 322 Shader
3. 298 Buffer
4. 160 Pointer

Nice demo, but perhaps something more complex than billboarded quads next time.
moichi
Thursday, August 19, 2004

FOURCC code "INST" is not available in my RADEON 9500 and Catalyst 4.8(DX 9.0c).
moichi
Thursday, August 19, 2004

It seems that Instancing path didn't work well on my RADEON 9500 and Catalyst 4.8(DirectX 9.0c).
NVIDIA Instancing demo didn't work too.(delete vs_3_0 capability check, but error on SetStreamSourceFreq())

Can all R3xx support DirectX 9.0c Instancing API on Catalyst 4.8?

More pages: 1 ... 11 ... 21 ... 31 ... 41 ... 51 ... 61 ... 71 ... 81 ... 91 ... 101 ... 111 ... 121 ... 131 ... 141 ... 151 ... 161 ... 171 ... 181 ... 191 ... 201 ... 211 ... 221 ... 231 ... 241 ... 251 ... 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 ... 271 ... 281 ... 291 ... 301 ... 311 ... 321 ... 331 ... 341 ... 351 ... 361 ... 365