"The direct use of force is such a poor solution to any problem. It is generally employed only by small children and large nations."
- David Friedman
More pages: 1 ... 11 ... 21 ... 31 ... 41 ... 51 ... 61 ... 71 ... 81 ... 91 ... 101 ... 111 ... 121 ... 131 ... 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 ... 161 ... 171 ... 181 ... 191 ... 201 ... 211 ... 221 ... 231 ... 241 ... 251 ... 261 ... 271 ... 281 ... 291 ... 301 ... 311 ... 321 ... 331 ... 341 ... 351 ... 361 ... 365
Query FailedHumus
Thursday, March 6, 2008

This is a DX9 demo, so having R2VB support in DX10 is not going to help.
Nuninho1980
Thursday, March 6, 2008

I have 8800gts (r2vb support only in dx10) and I have vista x64 but I still don't run by error (no support r2vb). will you fix?
Nuninho1980
Wednesday, March 5, 2008

I have vista x64 and I have 8800gts 640 w/ fw 174.12. I got 528 fps (1024x768@4xAA-16xAF) in camera default!!! :O
Nuninho1980
Wednesday, March 5, 2008

I got 160 fps in camera default and I got min 70 fps (1280x960@4xAA-16xAF) in fw 174.12! now my 8800gts got 40% better performance!! you look my message in december, 12 2007.
Nuninho1980
Wednesday, March 5, 2008

too sorry! I have vista x64 w/ fw 174.12(guru3d.com). this driver is for force v-sync. thanks. I got min 105fps (1024x768@4xAA-16xAF) and I got 240 fps (camera default)!!
thanks. you try uninstall (must restart) your old driver and install driver 174.12 for work v-sync.
thanks!!
eXile
Friday, February 22, 2008

Nah ... computer generated pictures look more realistic! :P
Nuninho1980
Saturday, February 16, 2008

"v-sync" is very, very, very important!!!!! why not v-sync????? please HEEELLLP,HUMUS!!! HUMUS!!!HUMUS!!! HUMUS!!! HUMUS!!! HUMUS!!! HEEELLLP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Axel
Friday, February 15, 2008

As long as ATI doesn't provide at least a minimal extension set to provide D3D10 capabiltities I don't think you will see any OpenGL demos here.

NVIDIA on the other hand does provide them, but ATI has decided not to implement them (they are EXT extensions and could be implemented by ATI). One reason could be that they want to focus on OpenGL 3.0 when it's ready and not to implement everything twice.
More pages: 1 ... 11 ... 21 ... 31 ... 41 ... 51 ... 61 ... 71 ... 81 ... 91 ... 101 ... 111 ... 121 ... 131 ... 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 ... 161 ... 171 ... 181 ... 191 ... 201 ... 211 ... 221 ... 231 ... 241 ... 251 ... 261 ... 271 ... 281 ... 291 ... 301 ... 311 ... 321 ... 331 ... 341 ... 351 ... 361 ... 365